Course taught by Tamara Ćapeta (tcapeta@pravo.hr)
Professor of EU Law
University of Zagreb
Faculty of Law
Offered in following Programmes:
AMES - Advanced Master of European Law
2009 classes start on Tuesday, 27 October at 5 p.m.
Venue: Ćirilometodska street 4, classroom 3
Exam February 2010This is a take-home exam. Answers must be returned by Monday, 15 February 2010 at 11 a.m. to tcapeta@pravo.hr
You will find more detailed instructions together with the exam questions, which may be downloaded here: |
Course Materials
Unit I - Who are European Judges?
(Tuesday, 27 October, 17 - 19.30)
Learning outcomes
Students will be capable to:
- understand the internal organization and the ways of internal functioning in the European Court of Justice;
- understand the reasons of such organization and to discuss its drawbacks;
- understand the concept of limited jurisdiction of the Court and know the basic headings of its jurisdiction;
- understand the reasons and modes of making national courts of the EU Member States the part of the EU judiciary
Preparation for class:
Unit II - What do judges do?
(Tuesday, 3 November 2009, 17 - 19.30)
Learning outcomes
Students will be capable to:
- understand the role of judges in law-creation
- be able to discuss legitimacy of judicial law-creation
- be able to read decisions of European court taking into consideration role of judges in the development of legal rules
Preparation for class (obligatory reading):
Further reading (optional reading):
- Cappelletti
- Fennelly
- Alter
- Dehousse
Unit III - Enforcement Actions against Memeber States
(Tuesday, 10 November 2009, 17 - 19.30)
Learning outcomes
Students will be capable to:
- understand the purpose of the enforcement actions against Member States
- recognize the weaknesses of this procedure, especially for the protection of rights of individuals
- decide how to use this procedure as lawyers
- understand and discuss changes introduced by the Lisbon Treaty
Preparation for class (obligatory reading):
- Reading Unit III
- C-265/95 Commission v France (Spanish Strawberries)
- Commission Complaint Form
- C-304/02 Commission v France
- Commission Communication on penalties
Further reading (optional reading):
Unit IV - Judicial Review of EU law
(Tuesday, 17 and 24 November 2009, 17 - 19.30)
Learning outcomes
Students will be capable to:
- understand the purpose and political problems involved in judicial review
- understand direct and indirect ways of challenge to EU acts
- understand how have these procerdures changed in the judicial prectice and the reasons for it
- decide how to use this procedure as lawyers
- understand and discuss changes introduced by the Lisbon Treaty
Preparation for class (obligatory reading):
- Reading Unit IV
- case Plaumann (read for 17 November)
- case Foto-Frost (read for 17 November)
- case TWD (read for 17 november)
- case UPA - AG Jacobs (read for 24 November)
- case UPA - ECJ (read for 24 November)
- case Jego Quere - CFI (read for 24 November)
- case Jego Quere - ECJ (read for 24 November)
Further reading (optional reading):
Unit V - Preliminary Ruling Procedure on Interpretation
(Tuesday, 1 and 8 December 2009, 17 - 19.30)
Learning outcomes
Students will be capable to:
- understand the purpose of the preliminary ruling procedure
- understand how and why was the procedura adjusted in the judicial practice
- understand how to use this procedure as a lawyer for the benefit of a client
. understand how to use this procedure as a judge
- understand and discuss changes introduced by the Lisbon Treaty
Preparation for class (obligatory reading):
- Reading Unit V
- case Rheinmuehlen
- case Folglia v Novello II
- case CILFIT
- Joined cases Salumi
- Note to national courts (new!)
Further reading (optional reading):
- Opinion of AG Colomer in case De Coster
- Joined cases Dzodzi
- Opinion of AG Darmon in Dzodzi
- Joined cases Da Costa
Practicum: How to writte preliminary reference
(Tuesday, 15 December 2009)
Learning outcomes
Students will learn how to writte preliminary reference to the ECJ
Preparation for class:
HAPPY NEW YEAR !
Unit VI - National Courts in EU Judicial Order - Fundamentals Revisited
1 - Direct Effect
(Tuesday, 12 January 2010, 17 - 19.30)
Learning outcomes
Students will be capable to:
- understand judicial development of concept of direct effect
- understand the impact of that concept on the powers of the Member States' courts
- think critically about the concept of direct effects
Preparation for class (obligatory reading):
Further reading (optional reading):
- Craig (2009) The Legal Effects of Directives: Policy, Rules and Exceptions (sent to AMES group)
Unit VI - National Courts in EU Judicial Order - Fundamentals Revisited
2 - Constitutional Issues of Supremacy
(Tuesday, 19 January 2010, 17 - 19.30)
Learning outcomes
Students will be capable to:
- understand judicial development of concept of supremacy
- understand the impact of that concept on the powers of the Member States' courts
- understand constitutional difficulties related to judicial application of supremacy
Preparation for class (obligatory reading):
- Reading Unit Vi/2
- case Simmenthal
- Croatian Constitution
- Proposal for Constitutional Amendments
- Monica Claes (excerpt from the book) - sent to group
Further reading (optional reading):
Unit VI - National Courts in EU Judicial Order - Fundamentals Revisited
3 - Interpretative Effects
(Tuesday, 26 January 2010, 17 - 19.30)
This is our last class. Thus, we will use it not only to talk about interpretative effect, but also to review the issues about which we have talked in previous classes in order to prepare you better for the exam. As you will have to solve a hypothetical case as one of the exam questions, in this class we will work on the basis of a hypothetical case. Please do read the hypothetical case in your materials (below). Think about the answers to the questions asked.
Reading for this Unit is supposed to remind you how has judicial doctrine of indirect or interpretative effects developped. You have already talked about this in the first semester.
Learning outcomes
Students will be capable to:
- understand judicial development of interpretative obligation of national courts
- understand the impact of that concept on the powers of the Member States' courts
- discuss about the limits of such obligation
Preparation for class (obligatory reading):